We make complex therapies work in the real world

It takes a village to deliver a complex therapy: your cross-functional team plus the external partners who control real-world constraints. Mind Meetings are 3-day alignment sprints that bring your therapy’s entire village into one room. We map the pathway end to end, identify key constraints, and align on a realistic plan you can run the next day.

Trusted by 20+ organizations across 3 continents on high-stakes execution challenges

Biogen and Eisai delivered directly by Mind Meeting Group. Additional engagements facilitated through Syntegrity Group.

The cost of complexity

Complex-therapy launches fail at the seams: internal silos, multi-step care pathways, and hard capacity limits in the health system. When constraints stay hidden, plans reset across handoffs—and patient access stalls.

77 %

Leaders report fragmentation

77% of leaders report that silos between departments hinder strategy execution and innovation. When ownership is split, plans reset at handoffs and delivery breaks down at the seams.¹

10 +

Roles in the “village”

Complex-therapy delivery can involve 10+ distinct practitioner roles from screening to diagnosis to monitoring. If the “village” isn’t aligned, handoffs fail and execution stalls.²

< 2 %

Access to complex treatments

Modeled capacity suggests fewer than 2% of eligible patients could access required resources in year one for an Alzheimer’s DMT. It’s one example of how capacity constraints can collapse access.³

Complex therapies fail at the handoffs

Ad boards and roundtables surface perspectives. Traditional consulting produces analysis and recommendations. Mind Meetings run a cross-stakeholder decision process that makes trade-offs explicit and leaves you with owners, decision rights, and a 30/60/90 you can execute.

What you get
Mind Meetings
Advisory Boards
Traditional consulting

Working time

~16 hours across 3 days

2–3 hrs

Weeks to months

Stakeholder coverage

End-to-end ecosystem. Internal and external constraint owners

One slice. Usually clinicians or experts

Broad interviews, often not in the same room

Core output

Decision-grade plan with owners, explicit handoffs, and 30/60/90 actions

Expert input with key risks, trade-offs, and directional guidance

Fact base and options with recommendations, roadmap, and deliverables

Decision rights and governance

Clarified decision rights, stage gates, and escalation paths

Advisory only. No decision authority

Proposes governance. Adoption varies

Execution ownership

Sponsor team plus a defined coalition with commitments

Sponsor team must translate

Sponsor team must translate and drive change

Best used when you need

Fast alignment across organizations, constraints, and dependencies

Specialist perspectives on a defined question

Deep analysis, sizing, benchmarking, and option development

Why teams pick Mind Meeting Group

Fast alignment, decision-grade outputs, and execution plans your team can run tomorrow. See the full breakdown.

Strategy and execution planning icon (Alignment Sprint)

Go from debate to decision in 3 days

Mind Meetings compress months of alignment into a decision-grade working session. Teams leave with explicit trade-offs, clear decision rights, and a sequenced 30/60/90 plan.

Network of stakeholders icon representing the ecosystem in one room

Mobilize the full “delivery village”

We convene internal owners and external decision-makers who control real constraints: clinicians, payers, PSP and pharmacy partners, diagnostics and imaging, operations, and patient advocates.

Handoff icon representing decisions decaying across cross-functional and field handoffs

De-risk the handoffs that stall launches

Most failures happen between functions and partners, not within them. We surface bottlenecks early and translate them into practical handoffs, owners, and operating cadence.

Deliverables your team can use tomorrow

No decks that die on the SharePoint shelf. You get artifacts built for execution: pathway map, assumptions log, decision register, governance model, and an implementable action plan.

How teams use Mind Meetings

Mind Meetings help teams use the “village” to build Canada-ready commercialization and delivery. We align the right stakeholders on a shared fact base, make trade-offs explicit, and leave with named owners, clear handoffs, and a runnable 30/60/90 plan.

Canada flag icon representing global-to-Canada fit for Canadian launch planning

Localize global strategy

Translate evidence, pricing logic, and operating assumptions into a Canada-ready pathway. Align payers, clinicians, diagnostics, and delivery partners on what must be true so the plan works end-to-end.

Black cube icon representing Canada as a “black box” system with hidden constraints

Build the real pathway map

Turn the “black box” into an end-to-end view of who does what, when, and why. We surface hidden constraints, dependencies, and failure points early, before they create rework.

Scatterplot icon representing provincial variability across 13 healthcare delivery systems

Design for provincial variation

Create a repeatable core model that can flex by province and region. We define minimum standards, allowable variation, and the decisions that need to be made once, not re-litigated thirteen times.

Safe with dollar sign icon representing that funding alone does not solve system throughput

Shift from funding to throughput

Move beyond “get funded” to “get delivered.” We align on capacity, workflow, sequencing, and monitoring requirements so patient access scales with the system’s real operating limits.

Network and gear icon representing shared risk with no single pathway owner

Assign decision rights and owners

Clarify who owns which decisions across functions and partners. We leave with a decision register, named owners, escalation paths, and a governance cadence that keeps execution moving.

Stop hand sign icon representing advocacy efforts stalling due to policymaker inertia

Convert advocacy into action

Translate stakeholder engagement into concrete commitments, sequencing, and artifacts. We define the asks, the evidence, and the delivery changes required so coalitions produce outcomes, not just alignment.

Why Mind Meetings work

Mind Meetings bring the whole delivery village into one decision-grade sprint. In about 16 hours, you surface constraints, stress-test trade-offs across 10+ stakeholder types, and leave with locked decisions, named owners, and a first-wave plan.

10 X

Health ecosystem coverage

Advisory boards typically convene one external stakeholder type at a time. Our workshops bring 10+ stakeholder types together with your team, so constraints surface early, trade-offs get tested across the ecosystem, and you avoid rework after the meeting.⁴

6 X

Better decision process

Getting the right people in the room is only step one. The decision process drives outcomes 6X more than extra input or analysis. We run a structured sprint so leaders decide with confidence—unlike roundtables that surface views but don’t lock decisions or owners.⁵

16 hrs

From debate to first-wave plan

Complex problems don’t resolve in one pass. Mind Meetings use tight cycles to surface constraints, compare options, and converge on decisions. In about 16 hours, you leave with a first-wave plan your team can execute—unlike 2–3 hour advisory boards or roundtables.⁶

Align your village in 3 steps

In 3 days, we mobilize the right stakeholders, turn complexity into clear choices, and translate decisions into an operating model and 30/60/90 plan your team can run.

1

Frame the challenge and mobilize the village

Define the outcomes that matter, then convene the internal owners and external stakeholders who control the constraints. Everyone arrives with a shared fact base and clear roles.

2

Surface constraints and choose a strategy

In a facilitated 3-day working session, we map the pathway end to end, expose assumptions, pressure-test options, and align on an innovative strategy fit for the challenge.

3

Get an operating model and 30/60/90

We prepare the strategy for execution: named owners, clear handoffs, governance cadence, and tactical plans your team can run immediately. You leave with a sequenced plan, not a slide deck.

The Mind Meeting Group team

We’re a team of strategy consultants and facilitators who bring cross-functional leaders into one room to make trade-offs explicit, align on what’s true, and leave with accountable owners and sequenced actions.

Photo of Mind Meeting Group Founder and Lead Facilitator Mark McCarvill
Mark McCarvill
Founder & Lead Facilitator
Photo of Mind Meeting Group Facilitator Karen Elkin
Karen Elkin
Facilitator
Photo of Mind Meeting Group Facilitator Lynn Fergusson
Lynn Fergusson
Facilitator
Photo of Mind Meeting Group Facilitator Michelle Nelson
Michelle Nelson
Facilitator
Photo of Mind Meeting Group Facilitator Judy Wolf
Judy Wolf
Facilitator

READY TO BUILD ALIGNMENT?

Let's discuss your challenge

Tell us about your commercialization challenge and we’ll schedule a confidential conversation to explore how a Mind Meeting workshop can help.

Sources and research citations

  1. 77% fragmented. AchieveIt. 2025 State of Strategy Execution Report (survey of 250+ senior organizational leaders): 77% of leaders report that silos between departments hinder strategy execution and innovation.
  2. 10+ roles in the “village.” Alzheimer’s anti-amyloid DMT exemplar (Canada): delivery typically spans 10+ distinct practitioner roles across referral, eligibility confirmation (PET or CSF), MRI safety monitoring, infusion administration, and follow-up—e.g., family physician and/or nurse practitioner (early identification, coordination), neurologist, geriatrician, and/or geriatric psychiatrist (specialist assessment/prescribing model varies), nuclear medicine physician (amyloid PET oversight), PET technologist (amyloid PET scanning), lumbar puncture proceduralist (often neurologist or anesthesiologist, when CSF is used), clinical laboratory technologist (APOE genotyping and/or CSF biomarker analysis), radiologist/neuroradiologist (ARIA/MRI interpretation), MRI technologist (serial MRI acquisition), infusion nurse (IV administration), and pharmacist (medication oversight).
  3. <2% access. Black SE, Budd N, Nygaard HB, et al. “A Model Predicting Healthcare Capacity Gaps for Alzheimer’s Disease-Modifying Treatment (DMT) in Canada.” The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences. 2024;51:487–494. doi:10.1017/cjn.2023.270.
  4. 10X health ecosystem coverage. “Coverage” here means unique external stakeholder types in the ecosystem relevant to the therapy/workflow (e.g., diagnostic, clinical, payer/policy, patient, operational roles)—not the number of people in the room. A typical advisory board convenes one external stakeholder type at a time (e.g., specialists only). Across each of MMG Alzheimer’s readiness workshops (Biogen, Eisai), we convened 10 unique external stakeholder types together with the sponsoring pharma team—~10X the stakeholder-type breadth of a single advisory board. Source: MMG stakeholder coverage analysis and participant rosters (Biogen Alzheimer’s readiness workshop; Eisai MRI system readiness workshop).
  5. 6X better decisions after input. Based on McKinsey research on 1,048 major corporate decisions over five years (e.g., new products, M&A, capital allocation). The analysis found that decision-process quality explains decision effectiveness roughly 6X more than the amount of analysis alone. Source: Dan Lovallo and Olivier Sibony, “The case for behavioral strategy,” McKinsey Quarterly (2010).
  6. 16 hours from debate to first-wave plan. “16 hours” refers to the approximate net facilitated working time in a three-day Alignment Sprint (excluding breaks). Within that window, teams convert input into a sequenced first wave of actions with named owners, plus a roadmap of timelines and dependencies. Source: MMG Alignment Sprint agenda and workshop outputs.